<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheating on SCORM Courses &#8211; It&#8217;s Not Difficult</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vsscorm.net/2009/07/31/cheating-on-scorm-courses-its-not-difficult/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vsscorm.net/2009/07/31/cheating-on-scorm-courses-its-not-difficult/</link>
	<description>A Very Simple SCORM Interface</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 18:07:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AICC or SCORM: Which Is Best for Packaging E-Learning Content? &#124; Accelerated Business Results</title>
		<link>http://www.vsscorm.net/2009/07/31/cheating-on-scorm-courses-its-not-difficult/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>AICC or SCORM: Which Is Best for Packaging E-Learning Content? &#124; Accelerated Business Results</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vsscorm.net/?p=589#comment-326</guid>
		<description>[...] This is not a typical requirement, but it does come up. If you need a secure connection, then AICC is your best choice because it will allow you to send information over secure HTTP (HTTPS). SCORM uses JavaScript functions, so the information is not secure. SCORM also has recently been singled out as an easy-to-cheat-on specification. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is not a typical requirement, but it does come up. If you need a secure connection, then AICC is your best choice because it will allow you to send information over secure HTTP (HTTPS). SCORM uses JavaScript functions, so the information is not secure. SCORM also has recently been singled out as an easy-to-cheat-on specification. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

